Just In: New Man City 115 charges timeline emerges following hearing conclusion… Details & full report
Manchester City may learn the verdict of their financial charges by the end of January 2025, following the conclusion of their hearing on 115 alleged breaches of Premier League financial rules. The final outcome, including appeals, could stretch into the 2025/26 season.
DETAILS:
The hearing, which lasted nearly three months, wrapped up on Friday, marking a significant step in the case that began 20 months ago in February 2023. While the initial charges stood at 115, reports now suggest a total of 130 charges due to confusion surrounding rule applications for certain seasons.
A three-man independent panel is now tasked with reviewing the evidence. The Times reports that the panel is working “flat out” to deliver a verdict as soon as possible, potentially by late January 2025. However, the case’s complexity could lead to delays.
Should Manchester City be found guilty, potential penalties include a points deduction or relegation from the Premier League. However, any punishment might be postponed if City appeals the decision, a process that could take up to eight months.
For context, similar cases involving Everton and Nottingham Forest saw immediate points deductions, though Everton’s penalty was later reduced on appeal.
QUOTES:
A Premier League insider noted:
“This case is intricate and unprecedented, requiring thorough deliberation from the panel.”
Manchester City reiterated their stance:
“We strongly deny any wrongdoing and remain committed to defending ourselves vigorously.”
CITATIONS:
This report is based on reports from:
- The Premier League filed charges against Manchester City in February 2023.
- The Times suggests a verdict could come by January 2025.
- Past rulings on Everton and Nottingham Forest highlight possible precedents.
KEEP IN MIND:
Manchester City’s case could set a significant precedent in English football, with implications for both the club and the league. Fans and stakeholders will watch closely as the independent panel reviews the evidence in this high-stakes case.
Author
